Question regard part 2 of the University of Helsinki’s mooc.
For those of you that have finished the helsinki mooc part 2 I'd like to ask whether or not the quality of th course went down or stayed about the same. The reason I ask is because I'm starting to notice that a lot of the larger assignments where you build an application from start to finish are becoming more and nore vague and imposing restrictions on coding style and methodology that you wouldn't know until you go to submit your assignment for grading. It's starting to become annoying where they give the general functionality of the app but have a desired way of going about completing it. Which depending on how your code is set up may dictate an entire rewrite or at the very least a large rewrite, despite your program having the desired functionality. I know because I have all the solutions that are posted on github. I like the information that the course has and its style but it's getting to be a bit much. If this is how the rest of the course is I'd rather know now so I can just use a textbook to learn the more advanced topics.
Submitted July 12, 2017 at 07:19PM by PancakeBloat
via reddit http://ift.tt/2veiz7C